THE European Union has announced the recall of its ambassador to Niger following allegations by the country’s ruling military junta regarding the management of humanitarian aid funds. The junta accused the EU of mismanaging €1.3 million earmarked for flood relief, claiming the funds were distributed to international NGOs without transparency or collaboration with Nigerien authorities.
In a statement issued on Friday, the junta demanded an audit of the fund’s allocation. It accused the EU ambassador in Niamey of ‘dividing the funds among several international organisations without consulting the transitional government.’
The European External Action Service (EEAS) responded with a strongly worded rebuttal, stating: ‘The European Union expresses its profound disagreement with the allegations and justifications put forward by the transitional authorities.’
In response to the tensions, the EU recalled its ambassador to Niger for consultations in Brussels. The EEAS explained this decision was made to underscore the EU’s dissatisfaction with the junta’s claims and its approach to the issue.
Relations between the EU and Niger have been strained since a 2023 coup d’état ousted the democratically elected president, Mohamed Bazoum, replacing his government with military rule. The EU, a significant development and humanitarian partner for Niger, froze much of its financial assistance after the coup, citing concerns over governance and democracy.
The junta, led by General Abdourahmane Tchiani, has repeatedly clashed with Western powers over sovereignty and foreign influence. This latest incident involving the EU adds to ongoing disputes about foreign intervention and the management of international aid in Niger.
The junta’s accusations highlight a broader issue of trust between Niger’s transitional authorities and international donors. Analysts argue the situation underscores a power struggle over control of foreign aid in a country heavily reliant on external support.
The EU maintains that its funds were used transparently and effectively, with the EEAS stressing the importance of neutrality in humanitarian efforts.
‘The integrity of our aid distribution mechanisms is paramount, especially in crisis situations,’ said an EU official.
This case marks another test for Niger’s military government, as it seeks to balance its demands for sovereignty with the need for ongoing international aid.
The EU’s decision to withdraw its ambassador could strain relations further, limiting dialogue on humanitarian and developmental issues. Observers warn that escalating tensions may hinder much-needed aid delivery to vulnerable populations in Niger, particularly as the country grapples with the aftermath of severe floods.
This development highlights the challenges facing international actors in navigating the political landscape of Niger’s military-led administration while adhering to principles of transparency and good governance.
